01
The problem
The available gas-use information did not yet explain whether there was a problem worth acting on or a pattern that needed more context.
The next step needed to be based on what could be observed, not on an assumed cause or fix.
02
The evidence

The review brought relevant energy information and operational context into one structured view. It separated what was observable from what still needed checking.
Clearer questionsTurn a broad concern into specific points to test.
Less guessworkKeep assumptions visible while the evidence is reviewed.
03
The outcome
The team had a shared, reviewable basis for deciding what to investigate or implement next. The value was clarity: a disciplined conversation about options, grounded in the available evidence.
A clearer demand picture
Understand what the available evidence can say about gas use without relying on assumptions.
A defensible evidence trail
Give operational and finance teams a shared basis for reviewing the issue.
A practical next step
Focus attention on the actions most worth testing or taking forward.
